监听所获材料的证据能力探析  

Research on Competence of Evidence Obtained through Wiretapping

作　　者：吴承栩 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学法学院

出　　处：《江苏警官学院学报》2015年第2期65-69,共5页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute

摘　　要：对监听所获材料的证据能力的判断是防止侦查机关监听权力滥用的最后一道司法防线。非法监听的界定是对监听所获材料的证据能力判断的前提。司法实践中非法监听表现出多重样态,各国理论与司法实践对非法监听也颇存争议。在我国立法层面,基本没有涉及对监听所获材料证据能力的判断问题。应在立法中确立对非法监听的判断标准,区分附带监听中的非法与合法的界限。It is the last line of justice to prevent the abuse of investigating power through judging the ability of evidence obtained by wiretapping. And due definition of the concept of illegal wiretapping is the premise. The illegal wiretapping in judicial practice exhibits multiple states, it also disputes in theory and practice in comparative law. In the legislation of China, it does not merely involve the problem of judging the competence of evidence obtained by wiretapping. We should establish the criterion in legislation to judge the illegal wiretapping, distinguish the accompanying wiretapping from the illegal one and legitimate boundaries between them.

关 键 词：监听制度 非法监听 附带监听 证据能力 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学]