检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郝淑芳
机构地区:[1]河南省平顶山市中医院儿科,平顶山467000
出 处:《中国中医药现代远程教育》2015年第7期39-40,共2页Chinese Medicine Modern Distance Education of China
摘 要:目的明确中药药浴治疗小儿外感发热(风寒型)的退热疗效。方法收集符合入组标准的小儿外感发热(风寒型)患者77例,随机分为对照组和药浴组,对照组进行基础治疗,药浴组进行基础治疗加中药药浴治疗,记录并比较2组的起效时间和解热时间。结果 12组起效时间无显著性差异(P>0.05)2药浴组的解热时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。结论中药药浴联合常规治疗可缩短小儿外感发热(风寒型)的解热时间,但不能缩短退热起效时间。Objective To identify the curative effect of bringing down infantile exogenous fever by Traditional Chinese Medicine bath. Methods Collect 77 cases accorded with the standard set of infantile exogenous fever. All of the patients were randomly divided into con- trol group and bath group. The control group was given basic treatment; the bath group was given basic treatment and TCM bath treat- ment. The treatment course was two days. The curative effect time and antipyretic time of the two groups were recorded. Results The cu- rative effect time of the two groups had no significant difference. The time of antipyretic time of the treatment group is shorter than that of the control group (P〈0.05) . Conclusion Traditional Chinese medicine bath could shorten the antipyretic time but it can't shorten the time of bringing down the fever.
分 类 号:R272[医药卫生—中医儿科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117