事后抢劫罪的前提条件研究  

The Premise of Research Crime of Transferred Robbery

作　　者：张泉[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《临沧师范高等专科学校学报》2015年第1期50-54,共5页Journal of Lincang Education College

摘　　要：《刑法》第269条关于事后抢劫罪的规定,明确规定要成立事后抢劫罪,要求行为人先"犯盗窃、诈骗、抢夺罪"。根据罪刑法定原则,"犯盗窃、诈骗、抢夺罪"应以构成犯罪为标准,由于现行刑法不处罚相对刑事责任能力人实施盗窃、诈骗、抢夺行为,因此相对刑事责任能力人不应作为事后抢劫罪的主体。对于特殊类型的盗窃、诈骗、抢夺行为,根据包容竞合的适用原则"整体法优于部分法",应该优先适用特殊类型的盗窃、诈骗、抢夺犯罪,由于其不构成"盗窃、诈骗、抢夺罪",对其不适用事后抢劫罪。Article 269 of the criminal law provisions on crime of transferred robbery, make a clear regulation to set up crime of transferred robbery, people who must ＂theft, fraud, rob sin＂. According to the principle of a legally prescribed punishment, ＂theft, fraud, rob sin＂ should be on the basis of a crime, due to the current criminal law is not punishment relative capacity commit theft, fraud, rob, so relative criminal responsibility should not the subject of crime of transferred robbery. For special types of theft, fraud, rob behavior, according to the applicable principle of inclusive competition ＂integral method is better than some method＂, should be preferred for special type of theft, fraud, robbery crime, because it＇s don＇t make theft, fraud, rob sin, do not apply crime of transferred robbery.

关 键 词：事后抢劫罪 构成犯罪 相对刑事责任能力人 法条竞合 

分 类 号：D924.34[政治法律—刑法学]