检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]财政部财政科学研究所,北京100142 [2]江西理工大学,江西赣州341000
出 处:《当代经济管理》2015年第7期8-12,共5页Contemporary Economic Management
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目<我国稀土资源地环境风险准备金制度研究>(13CJY126)
摘 要:在矿产资源国家所有的大背景下,稀土资源表现为全民所有和集体所有两种具体形式;在资源开采过程中,全民所有权由各级行政部门或者地方政府代理。从政府取得采矿权许可证的矿产资源企业产权包括排他性产权和非排他性产权,这两类产权构成了矿区利益补偿的基础。分析表明,矿产资源开发的产权主体、利益主体与可持续发展的责任主体三者脱节,产生了一系列影响可持续发展的风险和问题。因而,实施稀土矿山资源环境产权制度改革是彻底解决矿山企业可持续发展问题的必要途径。Under the background that mineral resources own by the state, the ownership of the rare-earth resource is mainly presented into two forms as by the whole people or by collective. The administrative departments or local governments at all levels usually play the role of agents of these rights in the resources extraction process. Enterprises which obtain mining licenses usually have the exclusive property or non-exclusive prop- erty of relevant mineral resources, which formed the basis of the compensation responsibility. The analysis Shows that the subjects of mineral re- sources development, the stakeholders, and the subjects of the sustainable development's compensation are disconnected, which produced a series of risks and problems affecting the sustainable development. Therefore, the property system reform of rare earth resource is necessary in order to solve the sustainable developing problem of mining enterprises.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112