维特根斯坦意义使用论与系统功能语言学的对比研究  

A Comparative Study Between Wittgenstein's Meaning Use Theory and Systemic Functional Linguistics

作　　者：田华静[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学外国语学院,上海200240 [2]河南大学外国语学院,河南开封475001

出　　处：《河南理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第1期73-77,共5页Journal of Henan Polytechnic University:Social Sciences

基　　金：上海交通大学文科科研资助项目(13TS02)

摘　　要：维特根斯坦在批判其前期逻辑图像论的基础上,提出了意义使用论,主张从"语言游戏"中确定词语的意义,使对意义本真的追问成为其哲学思想研究的主题;以人类学和社会学为基础的系统功能语言学也强调语言在具体语境中的使用和功能。因此,从意义观、语境观、研究对象、研究目标等方面,系统综合分析维特根斯坦意义使用论与系统功能语言学的异同,探寻导致其差异的根源,具有重要的理论价值。Wittgenstein put forward his meaning use theory based on the criticism of his earlier logical image theory and proposed to determine the meaning of words from the language games, thus making the pursuit of meaning the theme running throughout his philosophical thought. Based on anthropology and sociology, systemic functional linguistics also emphasizes the use and functions of language in specific contexts. Therefore, it is of great theoretical significance to compare these two from the points of the meaning view, contextual view, research object and goal, and explore the origin of their main differences.

关 键 词：维特根斯坦 系统功能语言学 意义 语境 哲学观 

分 类 号：H0-05[语言文字—语言学]