不同病原学方法检查蠕形螨的效果及相关因素分析  

Effect on demodex diagnosis with different methods of pathology and analysis on relative factors

作　　者：杨迎春[1] 齐潇[1] 韩玉秋[1] 黎昀[1] 张澎[1] 白慧玲[1] 张军[1] 王国英[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学医学院,河南开封475004

出　　处：《青岛医药卫生》2015年第3期172-173,共2页Qingdao Medical Journal

基　　金：2014年度河南省高等教育教学改革研究项目(编号:2014SJGLX137)

摘　　要：目的比较不同病原学方法检查蠕形螨的效果,分析相关影响因素,提高蠕形螨的检出率。方法应用挤粘法、透明胶纸粘贴法对同一人群进行蠕形螨检查。结果挤粘法与透明胶纸粘贴法蠕形螨检出率分别为39.28%、21.72%,二者间差异有统计学意义(χ2=24.43,P<0.01)。结论挤粘法的检出率优于透明胶纸粘贴法。Objective To compare two different methods for pathogenic diagnosis of demodex and analyze on relative factors in order to increase detection rate of demodex. Methods Two methods were used to detect demodexmite infection in the same group of people. Results The infection rate of demodex was 39.28% and 21. 72%, respectively by squeezing and cellophane tape method and transparent adhesive tape method, which was of statistical differences（x^2 =24.43, P〈0.01）. Conclusion The detection rate of squeezing and cellophane tape method was higher than that of transparent adhesive tape method.

关 键 词：人体蠕形螨 挤粘法 透明胶纸粘贴法 

分 类 号：R384.4[医药卫生—医学寄生虫学]