检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医学创新》2015年第16期57-59,共3页Medical Innovation of China
摘 要:目的:研究重症胰腺炎急性液体积聚行两侧腹小切口腹膜后引流术的效果。方法:运用随机抽样的方法选取本院2011年1月-2014年9月收治的66例重症胰腺炎急性液体积聚患者,依据治疗方法将这些患者分为研究组(33例)和对照组(33例)。给予对照组患者剖腹引流术治疗,给予研究组患者两侧腹小切口腹膜后引流术治疗,然后对两组患者的引流量、拔除引流管时间、住院时间及不良反应发生情况进行统计分析。结果:研究组患者的引流量显著多于对照组(P<0.05);拔除引流管时间、住院时间均显著短于对照组(P<0.05);不良反应发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:重症胰腺炎急性液体积聚行两侧腹小切口腹膜后引流术的效果显著,值得在临床推广。Objective:To study the effect of both sides of a small abdominal incision retroperitoneal drainage research on acute pancreatitis fluid accumulation.Method:66 severe acute pancreatitis patients with fluid accumulation who were treated in our hospital from January 2011 to September 2014 were selected by random sampling method,they were divided into study group (33 cases) and control group (33 cases) according to the treatment methods.The control group was given laparotomy drainage treatment,while the study group was given both sides of the abdominal peritoneum incision and drainage treatment,and then the volume of drainage,the extubation time,hospital stay and adverse events of the two groups were analyzed.Result:The volume of drainage of the study group was significantly more than that of the control group(P〈0.05),the extubation time and length of hospital stay were significantly shorter compared with the control group(P〈0.05),the incidence of adverse events of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group(P〈0.05).Conclusion:The effect of both sides of a small abdominal incision retroperitoneal drainage on acute pancreatitis fluid accumulation is significant,so it is worthy of promotion.
关 键 词:重症胰腺炎急性液体积聚 两侧腹小切口腹膜后引流术 研究
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30