检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医学创新》2015年第17期116-118,共3页Medical Innovation of China
基 金:2013年深圳市医疗卫生科研项目(201303028)
摘 要:目的:比较一系列医药卫生政策实施前后基本药物和抗菌药物临床使用情况,评价其对医疗机构合理用药的影响。方法:选取某医院门急诊处方和出院病历,将2011年作为政策实施前组,2012年作为实施1阶段组,2013年作为实施2阶段组,进行实施前后的对照研究,考察政策实施的有效性和可行性。结果:实施2阶段基本药物门诊处方使用率为51%,基本药物金额使用率为33%。实施2阶段抗菌药物使用强度为38.67%,较实施前的76.06%明显下降,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);Ⅰ类切口手术预防使用抗菌药物比例也有明显下降,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:医药卫生政策和整治干预措施的出台对促进合理用药产生一定影响。Objective:To evaluate the impact of medicines policy on rational use of drugs by comparing the essential drugs and antibiotics.Method:A total of prescriptions in outpatients and emergency departments of hospital records,2011 was selected as a policy implementation group,2012 as part of the implementation of phase 1 group,2013 as part of the implementation of phase 2 group,before and after the implementation of the control study,the effectiveness and feasibility of the implementation of the policy were investigated.Result:The usage of prescriptions and essential drugs was 51% and 33% respectively.The implementation of phase 2 the intensity of use of antimicrobial agents for 38.67%,compared with the former of 73.06% were decreased significantly,the difference between the two groups had statistically significance(P〈0.05).Type I incision surgery to prevent use of antibacterial drugs proportion had decreased significantly,the difference had statistically significance(P〈0.01).Conclusion:Medicines policy and intervention measures have some effect on the promotion of rational drug use.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28