检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]聊城市人民医院超声科,山东聊城252000 [2]嘉兴市第二医院超声科,浙江嘉兴314000
出 处:《中华危重症医学杂志(电子版)》2015年第2期26-29,共4页Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine:Electronic Edition
摘 要:目的分析双重超声造影在胃癌术前分期的诊断意义。方法选择166例胃癌患者为纳入研究,术前对其行双重超声造影检查,分别用胃窗超声造影与双重超声造影结果进行术前分期,精确分期以术后病理检查结果为准。结果双重超声造影T分期诊断符合率(82.2%)高于胃窗超声造影术前T分期(60.1%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=25.499,P<0.05)。双重超声造影T1、T2、T3、T4诊断符合率分别为88.9%,82.8%,86.0%,88.7%,其中T2、T3和T4分期双重造影诊断符合率优于胃窗超声造影,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.340、4.150、11.257,P=0.011、0.042、0.001)。结论超声双重造影对胃癌术前分期有一定的临床价值。Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DUCS) in the preoperative T staging of gastric cancer. Methods A total of 166 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled in the study. All the cases have been preoperatively evaluated with the DUCS before the surgery. The diagnostic accuracy of oral ultrasonic contrast agent or DUCS for TNM staging of gastric cancer was determined by subsequent postoperative histopathologic findings. Results The overall accuracy of total T stage of DUCS was statistically higher than the oral ultrasonic contrast agent (82.2% vs. 60.1%, x^2= 25.499, P 〈 0.05), while the accuracy of T1, T2, T3 and T4 stage was 88.9%, 82.8%, 86.0% and 88.7, respectively. Compared with the oral ultrasonic contrast agent, the accuracy of T2, T3 and T4 stage of DUCS were obviously higher (x^2 = 6.340, 4.150, 11.257; P = 0.011, 0.042, 0.001, respectively). Conclusion The DUCS might have some clinical value on evaluating the preoperative T stage of gastric cancer.
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222