检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》2015年第10期959-962,共4页Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head And Neck Surgery
摘 要:目的:通过分析不同聋儿的短声ABR"V"波的潜伏期-强度函数(LIF)存在较大差异的原因,探讨依据LIF来预测听力图构型的可能性。方法:按照LIF数值的大小将其分为改变明显组和不明显组,并分别测试这些聋儿的短纯音ABR,根据短纯音ABR的结果来分析短声"V"波LIF出现差异的原因;同时记录正常幼儿组的结果作为对照。结果:明显组和不明显组的LIF值分别为(56.00±21.81)μs/dB和(16.53±6.73)μs/dB;他们的短纯音ABR 0.5~4.0kHz 4个测试频率的阈值分别为(65.00±7.32)、(68.13±6.55)、(70.63±6.80)、(78.12±8.34)dB和(93.13±7.04)、(79.37±7.72)、(69.38±8.54)、(66.25±8.06)dB。结论:聋儿短声ABR"V"的LIF数值较大者均为平坦或下降型听力损失,而较小者均为上升型听力损失,在1.0kHz尤其0.5kHz处听力明显比高频听力差。因此可以根据聋儿短声ABR"V"波LIF的大小来预测其听力图构型。Objective:The latency-intensity function (LIF) of wave V from click ABR of some deaf children showed great variation. We attempted to find out the intrinsic reasons. Method:The children recieved tone-burst ABR test. Result:Frequencies from 0.5-4.0 kHz have heen tested and the thresholds of tone-burst ABR were re- corded. The average thresholds of steeply LIF children at 0.5-4.0 kHz were (93.13±7.04), (79.37±7.72), (69.38±8.54), (66.25±8.06) dB respectively, while the average thresholds of shallower LIF children at these 4 frequencies were (65.00±7.32), (68.13±6.55), (70.63±6.80), (78.12±8.34) dB respectively. Conclusion:The results imply that the child with steeply LIF may have more hearing loss at frequencies 0. 5 and 1 kHz than those with shallower LIF. LIF may predict the audiogram configuration.
分 类 号:R764.43[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.120