检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴方伯[1] 李亚琳[1] 刘彪[1] 邓利斌[1,2] 周绪红[1,3]
机构地区:[1]湖南大学土木工程学院,长沙410082 [2]中航建筑工程有限公司,长沙410004 [3]重庆大学土木工程学院,400044
出 处:《混凝土与水泥制品》2015年第6期62-66,共5页China Concrete and Cement Products
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51278179)
摘 要:为研究干砌法和湿砌法两种不同砌筑方法对不同型号横孔连锁混凝土空心砌块砌体抗压性能的影响,通过四组(24个)砌体试件的抗压试验,对其破坏特征、抗压强度进行对比分析。研究结果表明,干砌砌体在受压过程中先有裂缝产生、发展的过程,然后才丧失承载能力,而湿砌砌体多在未捕捉到裂缝的情况下直接被压溃,且后者的抗压强度明显高于前者;不同砌筑方法对较小尺寸砌块砌体抗压性能的影响更为显著。In order to study the effect of dry masonry method and wet masonry method on compressive behaviors of different types of the cross bore chain concrete hollow block masonries, compression tests of four group (24) specimens were tested, and the differences between their failure characteristics and compressive strengths are analyzed. The results show that the dry masonry losses its bearing capacity after cracks appearing and developing, while the wet masonry is crushed without cracks appearing. The compressive strength of wet masonry is much higher than that of the dry masonry. The effect of different masonry methods on the masonry of smaller size is more obvious.
分 类 号:TU522.3[建筑科学—建筑技术科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.253.54