洛特曼文化符号学的学理反思  

Theoretical Reflection of Lotman's Cultural Semiotics

作　　者：李薇[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东轻工职业技术学院,广东广州510300

出　　处：《贵州大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第3期144-148,共5页Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"当代文论与‘去黑格尔化’研究"(13BZW004);教育部人文社会科学研究西部和边疆地区项目"超越现代与后现代--德勒兹差异思想及其对当代中国美学理论研究的启示"(12XJC751003);广东省哲学社会科学"十二五"规划项目"文论创新与经典重译"(GD12CZW10)

摘　　要：俄国文化符号学代表洛特曼倡导从文化描写的元系统出发,将文化与非文化视为互为制约、相互补充的复调结构。文化符号学不仅作为消解现代性的方案,有效避免了总体化的暴力倾向,揭示了复杂场域的权力关系引发的压制与突围,为地方文化、小型叙事提供了合法化存在的依据,同时促成文学性至文本性、文本性至互文性的转变,助益从文学的角度理解文化,从文化的视野阐释文学,跨学科、多学科的综合型理论研究范式的形成,对"后理论时代"的文学研究和文化研究具有重要的参考价值与理论意义。As the representative of Russian cultural semiotics,Lotman,from the cultural description of the element system,takes culture and non-culture as a polyphonic structure：mutual restricted and mutual supple-mented.Cultural typology is not only used as a program for digestion of modernity,which effectively avoids the overall propensity towards violence,reveals the complex field of power relations that lead to repression and break-through,and provides local culture,small narrative of the basis for the legalization of existence,but also contrib-utes to the changes from literariness to text,from text to inter-textuality and explaines the formation of compre-hensive theoretical research methods of literature,of the cross-disciplines,multiple cross-discipline.It is of great reference value and theoretical significance for literature study and cultural study in the post -theoretical age.

关 键 词：洛特曼 文化符号学 现代性 文学性 

分 类 号：G0[文化科学]