检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟李长 卢峰[1] 郭乐杭[1] 孙丽萍[1] 马方[1,2]
机构地区:[1]同济大学附属第十人民医院超声医学科,上海200072 [2]上海交通大学附属第六人民医院超声医学科,上海200233
出 处:《同济大学学报(医学版)》2015年第2期109-111,共3页Journal of Tongji University(Medical Science)
基 金:上海市级医院适宜技术联合开发应用推广项目(SHDC12014229)
摘 要:目的探讨超声造影对甲状腺结节良恶性鉴别诊断的价值。方法回顾分析接受超声检查的72例甲状腺结节患者(77个结节),对结节进行超声造影检查,与术后病理或穿刺病理结果对比,分析增强模式对甲状腺结节良恶性鉴别诊断的价值。结果在77个甲状腺结节中,42个为恶性结节,35个为良性结节。不均匀增强模式诊断甲状腺恶性结节的灵敏度、特异度、准确率分别为71.4%(30/42)、91.4%(32/35)、80.5%(62/77)。结论超声造影增强模式对甲状腺结节良恶性鉴别诊断具有较高价值。Objective To evaluate the application of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in differentiation of malignant thyroid nodules from benign ones. Methods Seventy-two patients with 77 thyroid nodules (35 benign and 42 malignant) were enrolled in the study. Patients underwent CEUS examination before surgery or biopsy; the imaging features of CEUS were examined. With histopathological/cytological diagnosis as gold standard the diagnostic value of CEUS was assessed. Results The CEUS findings revealed that among 42 malignant nodules 30 showed heterogeneous enhancement, while among 35 benign nodules 32 showed homogeneous enhancement. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy rates of heterogeneous enhancement pattern on CEUS for diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules were 71.4% (30/42), 91.4% (32/35)and 80.5 % (62/77), respectively. Conclusion CEUS can be used as an additional tool in the diagnostic work up of thyroid nodules.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.202