检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王曼[1] 曹阳[1] 张灿[1] 辜丽梅[1] 赵灵燕[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院第一附属医院急救部,北京100048
出 处:《蚌埠医学院学报》2015年第5期676-678,共3页Journal of Bengbu Medical College
摘 要:目的:探讨急救护理流程在严重多发伤患者急救中的应用价值。方法:将2012年1月至2013年1月采取常规急救护理方法抢救的严重多发伤患者45例作为对照组,将2013年2月至2014年4月采取急救护理流程进行抢救的患者58例作为观察组,对2组抢救所用的时间、从采血到用血时间及抢救成功率进行比较。结果:观察组抢救时间为(56.77±2.33)min,显著短于对照组的(113.89±3.12)min(P<0.01);急诊从采血到用血时间对照组为(85.3±5.5)min,明显长于观察组的(42.2±3.1)min(P<0.01);观察组抢救成功率为96.6%,与对照组的86.7%差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:急救护理流程能够使患者在最短的时间内得到有效救治,对于成功挽救患者生命意义重大。Objective:To explore the application value of emergency care process in salvaging the patients with severe muhiple trauma. Methods:Forty-five severe multiple trauma patients treated with conventional first aid methods from January 2012 to January 2013 and 58 cases treated with emergency care process from February 2013 to April 2014 were divided into the control group and observation group, respectively. The time of saving and blood using and rescue success rate between two groups were compared. Results: The saving time in observation group (56.77 ±2.33 min) was significantly shorter than that in control group ( 113.89 ±3.12 min) (P 〈 0.01 ). The blood using time in control group( 85.3 ±5.5 min) was significantly longer than that in observation group (42.2 ±3.1 ) rain( P 〈 0.01 ). The rescue success rate in observation group 96.6% and in control group 86.7% has no statistic difference(P 〉 0.05). Conclusious:The emergency care process in salvaging the patients is effective, which has great clinical significance in saving life.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222