洪颐煊《史记考异》的比较研究——兼对乾嘉考据史学衰落原因浅析  

Comparing Research on The Annotation of Historical Records by Hong Yi- xuan

作　　者：王振红[1] 

机构地区：[1]淮北师范大学历史与社会学院,安徽淮北235000

出　　处：《渭南师范学院学报》2015年第11期29-37,共9页Journal of Weinan Normal University

基　　金：教育部全国高等院校古籍整理研究工作委员会项目:洪颐煊<诸史考异>校注(1210)

摘　　要：洪颐煊《史记考异》凡129条,其中有28条是钱大昕、王鸣盛、王念孙、梁玉绳等乾嘉考据名家曾经考证过的内容。通过比较发现,在此28条之中洪说略同他说者凡8条,洪说误、他说是者亦有8条,洪说不如他说详备者达11条,洪说是、他说非者仅1条。洪氏晚出,却在考史内容、体例、方法等方面皆未能超越前贤,这在一定程度上表明到洪颐煊之时乾嘉考据史学颓势已显,失去了突破传统史学研究范式而重获生机的内在力量。There were 129 items in The Annotation of Historical Records by Hong Yi-xuan, and among them, there are 28 i-tems which were researched from the view of literature research by Qian Da-xin and Wang Ming-sheng and Wang Nian-sun and Li-ang Yu-sheng. By comparison, 8 items were found the same with others, 8 items were wrong, 11 items weren’ t more detailed than others, and 1 item was right in those 28 items. As a junior, the content, the style and the method in The Annotation of Historical Re-cords by Hong Yixuan wasn’ t better than predecessors, which showed that the historical textual research in the middle of Qing Dy-nasty declined and can’ t come to new life.

关 键 词：洪颐煊 史记考异 乾嘉考据史学 比较研究 

分 类 号：K204[历史地理—历史学]