检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭雪飞
机构地区:[1]深圳市南山区西丽人民医院龙光社康中心,广东深圳518055
出 处:《中医临床研究》2015年第14期97-98,共2页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察分析30例糖尿病性便秘患者经捏脊疗法联合中药治疗的临床效果。方法:随机选取2012年1月1日-2014年1月1日期间我院的60例糖尿病性便秘患者,随机分为对照组(30例)和试验组(30例)。给予对照组患者中药治疗,在对照组的治疗基础上,给予试验组患者联合捏脊疗法,观察、比较两组患者的治疗结果。结果:两组患者的便秘情况均有所改善,试验组治疗后的便秘积分[(3.0±0.9)分]高于治疗前[(7.3±1.3)分],P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义;试验组的总有效率(96.67%)高于对照组的总有效率(70.00%),P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论:捏脊疗法联合中药治疗糖尿病性便秘的临床效果好,能改善便秘情况,可考虑于合理范围内推广应用。Objective:To analyze clinical effects of the Nieji therapy plus TCM medicine on diabetic constipation. Methods:60 case of diabetic constipation in our hospital from January 2012 to January 2014 were randomly divided into the control group (30 cases) and the treatment group (30 cases). The control group received the TCM therapy, and the treatment group received the Nieji therapy more. Clinical efficacy in two groups were compared. Results:Constipation in two groups was improved. After the treatment, constipation score in the treatment group was (3.0 ± 0.9 points), higher than that in the control (7.3 ± 1.3 points), P<0.05. The difference was statistically significant. The total efficiency in the treatment group was 96.67%, higher than that in the control group (70.00%), P<0.05. The difference was statistically significant. Conclusion:The Nieji therapy plus TCM were effective on diabetic constipation, and worthy of promotion.
分 类 号:R256.35[医药卫生—中医内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.206