检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]郑州颐和医院中韩国际整形中心,河南郑州450000
出 处:《中国美容医学》2015年第10期46-48,共3页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察755nm翠绿宝石激光联合810nm半导体激光治疗唇毛的效果。方法:将笔者中心门诊唇部脱毛者90例随机分成三组,分别应用755nm翠绿宝石激光(755nm组),810nm半导体激光(810nm组),755nm与810nm激光联合治疗(联合组),每组各30例。间隔4~8周激光脱毛1次,共治疗6次,6次后间隔3个月进行疗效观察。结果:755组有效率90.00%、810组为93.33%,激光脱毛效果相当,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),而与联合组有效率(96.67%)比较,疗效差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:对于唇部脱毛单波段激光治疗疗效一般时,可联合不同波段激光仪进行补充治疗。Objective To observe the efficacy of 755 nm Alexandrite laser Combined with 810 nm diode laser on lip hair removal. Methods From May 2014 to March 2015,90 lip hair removal patients were divided randomly into three groups(755nm laser group,30cases;diode 810 nm laser group,30cases;755nm Alexandrite laser Combined with 810 nm diode laser group,30cases).Hair removal treatment was repeated 6 times with 4-8weeks interval.Clinical observation were performed after 3months at the 6th treatment to calculate hair decreasing density rate. Results The efficacy rate of lip hair removal in alexandrite 755 nm laser group were 90.00%,those in diode 810 nm laser group were93.33%,the differences were not statistically significant(P〉0.05),but the difference of three groups was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion The efficacy of single band laser treatment to the lip hair removal was poor,Combined with different wave band laser instrument for supplementary treatment is meaningful.
关 键 词:755nm翠绿宝石激光 810nm半导体激光 激光脱毛 联合疗效
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.225