同行评议与网络引文相关性实证分析——以心理学、免疫学为例  

Empirical Analysis on the Relationship between Peer Review and Network Citation——Taking Psychology and Immunology as the Example

作　　者：孙斌[1] 宋丽萍[1] 贺颖[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学管理学院

出　　处：《图书馆工作与研究》2015年第6期62-65,共4页Library Work and Study

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"科技政策视角下科学评价指标及方法研究"(项目编号:12BTQ033);天津市哲学社会科学规划重点项目"基于知识图谱的科学共同体研究领域动态分析与评价"(项目编号:TJTQ12-016)研究成果之一

摘　　要：本文选取F1000数据库心理学及免疫学栏目下文献近1500篇,采用Google Scholar数据库,凭借SPSS以及Publish or Perish软件,将上述论文的同行评议结果即F1000因子与Google Scholar、Web of Science数据库中指标进行相关分析,以期揭示同行评议与网络引文以及传统引文的相关性与一致性以及自然科学和社会科学在此方面的异同,并论证网络资源对于科学评价的影响。This article selects nearly 1500 articles in F1000 under Psychology and Immunology, and compares F1000 star ratings by expert assessment with other measures of paper＇s impact from Google Scholar and Web of Science by means of SPSS and Publish or Perish software. The re suit indicates that there is a positive correlations between F1000 ratings and impacts as measured by the number of citations overall. From this point of view, the author wants to reveal the association between web citation and peer review in natural and social sciences, and then argues the influence of network resources on research assessment.

关 键 词：同行评议 网络引文 GOOGLE SCHOLAR F1000 

分 类 号：G250.2[文化科学—图书馆学]