基于灰色系统(GRAY)的安徽省城市生态环境质量综合评价及对策研究  

Study on ecological environment quality comprehensive evaluations and countermeasures based on GRAY of Anhui province

作　　者：雷思友[1] 范君[2] 

机构地区：[1]安徽理工大学经济与管理学院,安徽淮南232001 [2]安徽理工大学学术出版中心,安徽淮南232001

出　　处：《安徽理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第2期25-30,共6页Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Social Science

基　　金：2013年安徽省科技厅软科学研究项目:基于低碳视角的安徽省煤炭资源型城市生态建设的研究(1302053056);2014年安徽省高校省级自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2014A060)资助

摘　　要：利用灰色系统综合评价法(GRAY)对安徽省城市生态环境质量进行综合评价。通过参考相关研究文献比较筛选评价指标,构建城市环境质量评价指标体系,用Delph法确定评价指标权重,结合2013年安徽省统计年鉴数据资料,对安徽省城市生态环境质量进行综合评价,得出城市生态环境质量综合排序。研究结果表明安徽省南部城市生态环境质量较好,北部城市生态环境质量较差,尤其是安徽省两淮煤炭资源型城市生态环境质量综合排名处于最后,对两淮煤炭资源型城市生态城市建设存在的问题进行分析,并提出了相应的对策建议。This study uses GRAY to comprehensively evaluate ecological environment quality of Anhui province . By comparing and sifting evaluation index according to relevant literature and constructing quality evaluation in-dex system of urban cities,the paper determines the evaluation index weight via Delph method and in combina -tion with 2013Statistical Yearbook data of Anhui province , conducts a comprehensive evaluation of its ecological environment quality and concludes the integrated sorting of urban ecological quality.The results suggest that the ecological environment quality in the southern cities of Anhui province is better while that of the northern cities is poor, especially that of coal resource-based two cities of Huainan and Huaibei which ranks last .Moreover,the paper analyzes the problems existent in those two cities and proposes corresponding countermeasures and sugges -tions.

关 键 词：GRAY法 综合评价 城市生态环境质量 对策与建议 

分 类 号：F205[经济管理—国民经济]