政治自由主义:一个完整的慎议政治的故事  

Political Liberalism: An Integrated Story of Deliberative Politics

作　　者：谭安奎[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学政务学院,广州510275

出　　处：《南京大学学报（哲学．人文科学．社会科学）》2015年第3期120-128,159,共9页Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"当代西方政治哲学中的福利权问题研究"(13BZX086);教育部人文社会科学研究项目"当代契约主义的慎议民主理论探究"(12YJC720030)

摘　　要：有一种持久的批评认为,罗尔斯所寻求的一直是实质性的正义共识,这导致无论是其原初状态中选择正义原则的方式,还是良序社会中公共理性的约束,都限制了民主政治的活力。但基于对重叠共识理念的分析,我们可以发现,共识的对象仅仅是作为推理规范的公共理性,而公共理性在原初状态与良序社会两个阶段中都塑造了某种形式的慎议政治。因此,政治自由主义首先是一种完整的慎议政治理论,而且它把慎议政治的模式扩展到了狭隘的公共领域之外,从而为我们用慎议民主理念解释基本制度结构的生成提供了空间。According to a lasting criticism,the substantive consensus on justice that John Rawls never gave up seeking after actually weakens the vitality of democratic politics,and this is due not only to the way of choosing the principles of justice from the very beginning,but also to the constraint of public reason in a well-ordered society. But an analysis on the idea of overlapping consensus reveals that the object of the supposed consensus is nothing but public reason,or rather a norm of reasoning,which helps to bring into being a deliberative politics on theoretical stages of both the original position and the well-ordered society. Hence,political liberalism is a united theory of deliberative politics,and this theory extends the mode of deliberative politics beyond the narrow public sphere,so that we can interpret the being of the basic institutional structure with the idea of deliberative democracy.

关 键 词：罗尔斯 重叠共识 公共理性 相互性标准 慎议政治 政治自由主义 

分 类 号：D0[政治法律—政治学]