两种鼻饲胃管固定方法的效果比较  

Effects of two stomach tube fixing methods in patients with nasal feeding

作　　者：蒋丽双 蒋玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西壮族自治区南溪山医院,广西桂林541002

出　　处：《华夏医学》2015年第1期64-66,共3页Acta Medicinae Sinica

摘　　要：目的:比较两种鼻饲胃管固定方法的应用效果。方法:120例鼻饲患者按置管日期分为观察组(单日)和对照组(双日),每组60例。观察组采用1次性输液延长管固定胃管;对照组采用布质胶布固定胃管,观察分析两组胃管移位、胃管脱落、皮肤异常及患者的舒适度。结果:观察组胃管移位、胃管脱落、皮肤异常情况发生率低于对照组,舒适度评价高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:1次性输液延长管固定胃管优于布质胶布固定。Objective： To compare the effect of two stomach tube fixing methods for patients with nasal feeding. Method： 120 cases received nasal feeding were divided into the study group （odd days） and the control group （even days） according to the date of stomach tube insertion, 60 cases in each group. The study group was adopted disposable extension tube to fix stomach tube, and the control group used adhesive piaster cloth. The incidence of stomach tube shifting, stomach tube shedding and skin abnormalities was observed and compared between the two groups, along with comfort de gree of patients. Results： The study group has less incidence of stomach tube shifting, stomach tube shedding and skin abnormalities than that in the control group, and thus the patients in study group felt more comfortable （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： For stomach tube fixation, the disposable ex tension tube is superior to adhesive plaster cloth

关 键 词：鼻饲胃管 固定方法 效果 

分 类 号：R473.57[医药卫生—护理学]