检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中交二公局第四工程有限公司,河南洛阳471013 [2]长安大学公路学院,西安710064
出 处:《路基工程》2015年第3期17-21,共5页Subgrade Engineering
摘 要:以营双高速公路沙漠边坡为依托,对沙漠公路防沙体系的建设及生态防护、经济效益进行了研究,提出了生态防护设计方案。基于层次分析法中的多级模糊评价方法对沙漠路段的两个设计方案进行优选,根据沙漠公路边坡防护设计原则及适生植物选取原则对边坡防护中应用的各种措施进行防风固沙效益、经济效益比较分析,从中筛选出防治效果好,设置成本低,设计合理的边坡生态防护设计方案。结果表明:方案一略优于方案二,即路堑边坡采用柴草沙障护坡,在沙障内栽植花棒,播撒草籽,积沙平台采用红柳+撒播草籽。This paper, based on the desert slope ecological protection and economic benefit of the of Yingshuang Highway, has studied the construction, sand control system for desert highway and provided an ecological protection design scheme. The optimized one of design schemes for desert highway is selected in the multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method of AHP, for the comparative analysis of economic benefits of windbreak and sand-fixation after various measures for slope protection taken according to the slope protection design principle of the desert highway and optimum plant selection principle and the ecological slop protection design scheme with good control effect, low cost and design reasonability has been choiced. The resuhs show Scheme 1 is superior to Scheme 2, i. e. use slope protection and planting of hedysarum scoparium and of firewood sand-protecting barrier for cut slope as seeding of grass seed in the sand-protecting barrier.
关 键 词:沙漠公路 生态防护 方案比选 层次分析法 多级模糊评价 经济效益
分 类 号:U418.9[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.151