检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆大学公共管理学院,重庆400030 [2]清华大学中国发展规划研究中心,北京100084
出 处:《管理评论》2015年第4期13-20,共8页Management Review
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费项目(CDJKXB13003)
摘 要:资料显示,2012年我国单位国内生产总值能耗是日本的7倍、美国的6倍,甚至是印度的2.8倍。我国的节能降耗任务严峻。而节能降耗工作重点是钢铁、煤炭、电力等资源型行业,这些行业不少集中在资源型地区。如何降低资源型地区企业特别是资源型行业企业的能源消耗?哪些因素对资源型行业企业节能绩效产生显著性影响?本文以文献为基础,归纳影响企业节能绩效的影响因素。通过调研山西省350家规模以上工业企业数据,研究企业、政府、市场三者对资源型行业企业节能绩效的影响大小。实证研究结果表明:企业节能投入对资源型行业企业节能绩效作用最大,其次是企业节能管理,政府节能引导、市场融资水平和节能服务环境对资源型行业企业节能绩效不显著。The data shows that in 2012, energy intensity per unit of GDP in China is 7 times that of Japan, 6 times of the U.S., and e- ven 2.8 times of India. The task of saving energy and reducing consumption is still urgent. And the efforts in saving energy and reducing consumption are focused on the iron, coal, electricity and other resource-based industries. It is worth considering how to reduce the energy consumption of the resource-based enterprises and which factors have significant effects on energy conservation performance of the resource-based enterprises. Based on the literature review, this paper builds the framework and indicator system, and tries to offer a tentative solution. The questionnaire survey to 350 enterprises in Shanxi shows that energy saving funding has the most significant positive effect on energy conservation performance, followed by the energy saving management. The government' s policies and energy-saving market environment have no significant positive effect on resource-based enterprise. Based on the finding, this paper gives relevant policy recommendations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117