我国专利无效诉讼中的证据规则之反思  

Reflection on the Rule of Evidence in Patent Invalidity Lawsuit in China

作　　者：熊文聪[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院 [2]中央民族大学法学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2015年第6期25-30,共6页Intellectual Property

基　　金：作者主持的"中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目"(编号:2014T70412):"中央民族大学自主科研项目:知识产权侵权诉讼举证责任研究"阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：证据规则是关涉当事人程序价值和实体权利的重要制度,围绕专利无效诉讼,我国行政诉讼法虽然建立了较为清晰明确的举证责任分配和补充新证据规则,但法院司法实践却并没有严格遵循这一立法安排。最高人民法院在一些典型案件中,为追求所谓"实质正义"、"效率优先",忽视乃至漠视"程序正义"、"法的普适性、稳定性、权威性"以及"听证原则"、"案卷排他主义"、"避免审级损失"等诉讼法基本原理和价值理念,改变既有的共识,这一做法值得深入探讨与反思。新行政诉讼法的相关规定表述笼统含糊,也有待司法解释的澄清。Rules of evidence are important mechanism on procedural interests and substantial rights of litigants. With respect to patent invalidity lawsuit, China administrative procedural law has established clear distribution rules on burdens of proof and new-evidence producing, while courts didn＇t follow the legislation strictly. In some typical cases, for chasing so-called substantial justice and priority to efficiency, the Supreme Court overlooked basic principles and values of procedural law, such as due process; universality, stability and authority of law; right of a hearing; file exclusive principle; avoidance of trial-rank loss, and so on. This transformation should be discussed and rethinking deeply. The related article in forthcoming Administrative Procedure Law is sweeping and ambiguous, and a piece of clarifying judicial interpretation is expectant.

关 键 词：专利无效诉讼 证据规则 公知常识 程序正义 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学] D925.33[政治法律—法学]