检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘娟[1,2]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学 [2]太原科技大学法学院
出 处:《知识产权》2015年第6期99-103,共5页Intellectual Property
基 金:国家社会科学项目:协商式行政执法研究(项目编号:13BFX035)的阶段性成果;西南政法大学2014年度行政法学院宪法学与行政法学学科博士研究生学术研究项目--释宪权力配置与实现机制关系研究的阶段性成果
摘 要:为对抗网络版权侵权,一些国家相继建立从警告到处罚的逐步反应制度。从推进路径来看,可以分为以法国为代表的公法模式和以美国为代表的私法模式。公法模式以行政权力为核心推进要素,经过宪法审查以司法保留方式解决版权保护引发的权利冲突问题。私法模式下制度建立通过协商谈判达成,制度设计体现出各方利益的微妙平衡。完善我国网络版权保护机制需要在结合法律传统、现实情况基础上,借鉴公、私模式处理类似问题的有益经验。Graduated response systems have been built in some countries in order to against online copyright infiingement. These systems can be divided into two patterns. One is the public law pattern as typical of three-strikes in France, the other is the private law pattern as typical of six-strikes in America. In public law pattern graduated response has been promoted by administrative power. Rights conflict triggered by copyright enforcement was solved by constitutional review. In private law pattern graduated response was built through negotiation balancing interests of parties. In order to perfect online copyright protection in China, it is needed to draw on experience of other countries and take our law tradition and actual conditions into account.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249