检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘甦[1]
出 处:《重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第3期30-33,共4页Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:TPP(跨太平洋伙伴关系)与WTO的适用冲突问题在TPP成立之初就存在争议。虽然WTO中对TPP的适用除外可从最惠国待遇原则的相关规定中找到理论依据,但由于缺乏规制,使得TPP侵蚀了MTA(多边贸易协定)的基础,架空了WTO规制的适用。我国应当揭开TPP面纱,明确其为贸易自由化之假象的实质,坚定本国立场,另辟蹊径发展贸易,并拒绝被边缘化。There is controversy between TPP and WTO about the conflict problem of application. Except for applicability, the theoretical basis of the relevant provisions of the MFN principle can be found in the WTO rules. Due to the lack of regulation, the TPP eroded the MTA's (multilateral trade agreements) basis, and made the WTO regulations ineffective. Therefore, China ought to disclose the TPP, making sure of its essence of the illusion of trade liberalization. On this basis, China should firm its trade position, find a different approach and refuse to be marginalized.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38