PCR检验法和细菌培养法用于阴道细菌检验的效果对比  

Effect Contrast of PCR Test and Bacterial Culture for the Vaginal Bacterial Test

作　　者：华玲 

机构地区：[1]五邑中医院恩平分院,广东恩平529400

出　　处：《中外医学研究》2015年第17期50-51,共2页CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH

摘　　要：目的:探析阴道细菌检验进行细菌培养法与PCR检验法的效果观察。方法:选取笔者所在医院2013年3月-2014年3月收治的80例细菌性阴道病患者作为研究对象,分别对其进行细菌培养法与PCR检验法,比较两种方法的检测准确率情况。结果:PCR检测法的阴性检出率26.2%明显低于细菌培养法的65.0%,阳性检出率73.8%明显高于细菌培养法的35.0%,其中肠球菌检出率13.8%、加特纳菌检出率42.5%、棒状杆菌17.5%均明显高于细菌培养法的3.8%、26.2%、5.0%,两种检验方法比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:细菌性阴道病进行PCR检验法,操作快捷简便,准确率高,效果确切,值得临床推广。Objective：To investigate and analyze the effect observation of bacterial culture and PCR test for the vaginal bacteria test.Method：80 patients with bacterial vaginosis admitted to our hospital from March 2013 to March 2014 were selected as research objects,and the bacterial culture and PCR test were respectively carried out.The examination precision rate of two methods were observed and compared.Result：The negative detection rate of the PCR test method was 26.2%,which was significantly lower than 65.0%of the bacterial culture method,the positive detection rate of the PCR test method was 73.8%,which was significantly higher than 35.0%of the bacterial culture method,the detection rate of enterococcus,gardnerella vaginalis,corynebacterium in the PCR test method were 13.8%,42.5%,17.5%,which were significantly higher than 3.8%,26.2%and 5.0%in the bacterial culture method,the differences were statistically significant（P〈0.05）.Conclusion：PCR test for bacterial vaginal disease,achieves the higher precision and better results in a fast and simple way.It is worthy of clinical promotion.

关 键 词：临床效果 细菌性阴道病 细菌培养法 PCR检验法 

分 类 号：R711.31[医药卫生—妇产科学]