图书馆学调查研究方法运用的微观考察——3种Top期刊调查研究报告解析  

A Study on the Utilization of Survey Method in the Field of Chinese Library Science from the Micro Aspect

作　　者：金梅[1] 张丽君[2] 刘君[3] 

机构地区：[1]贵州民族大学图书馆,贵阳550025 [2]<贵阳医学院学报>编辑部,贵阳5500023 [3]贵州大学公共管理学院,贵阳550025

出　　处：《图书情报工作》2015年第8期5-14,共10页Library and Information Service

摘　　要：[目的/意义]对我国图书馆学调查研究方法运用的微观过程及其具体的技术环节进行考察。[方法/过程]根据社会研究过程的ABCDE模型构建图书馆学调查研究方法运用的微观分析框架,对3种图书馆学top期刊发表的调查研究报告反映出来的调查研究过程中的具体要素进行辨识、编码和统计分析。[结果/结论]我国图书馆学调查研究主要有"抽样——问卷——定量分析"研究和"个案——访谈——定性分析"研究两种模式,但研究中普遍缺乏将"问题——理论——方法"相联系的整体意识;图书馆学调查研究还处于以"了解情况,明确事实"为主的初级阶段,以"揭示原因、发现规律"为目的的解释性研究还很少;调查研究的规范化、完整性程度持续提高,但凝练科学问题、规范研究设计仍是需要加强的薄弱环节。[ Purpose/significance] Deciphers the survey reports of library science in China to learn the micro process and concrete technical route of these survey researches. [ Method/process] Based on the ABCDE mode of the systematic： analysis of social research, this paper constructs the research frame feasible to the micro analysis of survey research in the field of Chinese library science, and then, identifies, encodes and analyses the materials related to the 201 survey reports of three TOP library science journals. [ Result/conclusion] Firstly, library science researches in China mainly include the ＂sampling-questionnaire-quantitative analysis＂ mode and the ＂case-interviewing-qualitative analysis＂ mode, but both lack of the universal consciousness of seeing the problems, theories and the methods as a whole. Secondly, library science research in China is still at the primary stage of descriptive studies oriented to ＂ask for information and clear the facts＂, and the interpretative studies oriented to ＂reveal reasons or found laws＂ are little. Finally, the normalization and completeness of the library science research in China have enhanced unceasingly, but refining the scientific problems, normalizing the designs are still the weak parts.

关 键 词：图书馆学 调查研究方法 学术规范 内容分析 

分 类 号：G250[文化科学—图书馆学]