检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁汪洋
机构地区:[1]华东交通大学人文社会科学学院,江西南昌330013
出 处:《鸡西大学学报(综合版)》2015年第6期86-89,共4页JOurnal of Jixi University:comprehensive Edition
摘 要:传统理论认为,应有权利、法定权利和现实权利三者之间按照应有权利到法定权利,再到现实权利这一逻辑顺序进行运转。然而,对应有权利的来源和根据的定位含混,以及过于倚重法定权利在权利运转中的中介作用,使得这一模式固定化,阻碍权利的理论视野。试在确定宪法作为应有权利的来源和根据的前提之下,发掘应有权利与现实权利可直接转化的运转新模式,及其对宪法司法化、宪法保留以及宪法现实性品质的相关启示。Traditional theory considered that the natural rights , legal rights and realistic rights operate according to this logical sequence:from the natural rights to the legal rights , then to realistic rights .However , the positioning of the source and basis of the natural rights is ambiguous , and the excessive emphasis on the intermediary role of the legal rights in the operation of rights makes the operational mode immobilized .Taking the Constitution as the source and basis of the natural rights , the paper explored the new operation that transition between the natural rights and the real rights , and explored the enlightenment to the constitutional judica-ture, constitutional reservation and reality quality of the Constitution .
分 类 号:D911[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33