检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈婷[1] 蒋丽[1] 何芳[1] 秦勤[1] 李林[1]
出 处:《中国医药导刊》2015年第5期518-519,共2页Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
摘 要:目的:研究综合护理干预应用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)合并呼吸衰竭患者的作用效果。方法:将四川大学华西医院呼吸内科收治100例COPD合并呼吸衰竭患者,随机分为研究组和对照组各50人,两组患者均施行常规的治疗和护理方式,研究组则应用综合护理干预。治疗后,比较两组疗效,并对血气分析指标进行比较。结果:研究组有10例转为有创通气,通气治疗率为20.0%;对照组转为有创通气16例,通气率32.0%;两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患者在通气后血气分析指标优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:综合护理干预在COPO合并呼吸道衰竭患者治疗中应用,可显著改善患者治疗效果。Objective: Comprehensive intervention nursing for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with respiratory failure.Methods:In our hospital respiratory department of internal medicine treated 100 cases of patients with COPD complicated with respiratory failure,were randomly divided into study group and control group each 50,two groups of patients underwent treatment and routine nursing,the research group used comprehensive nursing intervention.After treatment,the efficacy of two groups were compared,and the indexes of blood gas analysis were compared.Results:The study group 10 cases to invasive ventilation,ventilation rate was 20%;the control group was 16 cases of invasive ventilation,ventilation rate was 32%; there was significant difference between two groups (P 〈 0.05).Patients in the study group after ventilation,arterial blood gas analysis index is better than the control group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion:The comprehensive nursing intervention in treatment of patients with respiratory failure complicated with application in COPO,can significantly improve the treatment effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30