检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:夏淑艳[1]
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2015年第14期254-255,共2页China Health Standard Management
摘 要:目的:研究分析护理路径对支气管哮喘患者的护理效果。方法2011年~2012年我院有200例支气管哮喘患者接受研究分析,将这些患者分组为临床护理路径组和常规护理组,各有100例患者。对两组患者出院时对疾病的了解程度、护理满意度、健康知识掌握情况等进行比较分析。结果常规护理组患者的护理满意度是70.79%,护理路径组患者的满意度是97.34%,两组患者的护理满意度存在统计学差异性。结论支气管哮喘患者的临床护理使用护理路径具有比较好的护理效果,患者对相关疾病知识能够更加深入的了解,在生活中注意预防,对其健康有非常大的助益。ObjectiveTo study the effect of the nursing pathway for patients with bronchial asthma.MethodsSelected 200 cases of patients with bronchial asthma to research and analysis,these patients were grouped into clinical care pathway group and usual care groups,each with 100 patients. To understand the extent of disease in patients,nursing satisfaction,health knowledge and so were compared. Comparison of the two groups of patients to understand the extent of the disease,nursing satisfaction,health knowledge level.Results Usual care patient care satisfaction was 70.79%,clinical care pathway group was 97.34%. There were significant differences between the two groups.Conclusion The use of clinical nursing pathway treatment of bronchial asthma patients have relatively good care results,patient-related diseases can be more in-depth understanding of knowledge,attention to prevention in life, can contribute to the patient's health.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.55