检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李莎[1] 王芳[1] 房秀梅[1] 唐亮[1] 王晓燕[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院第一附属医院药剂药理科,北京100071
出 处:《中国药房》2015年第18期2517-2520,共4页China Pharmacy
基 金:国家科技支撑计划子课题(No.2013BAI06B04Y023-129)
摘 要:目的:系统评价格列吡嗪对比瑞格列奈治疗2型糖尿病的疗效和安全性,以为临床治疗提供循证参考。方法:计算机检索Pub Med、EMBase、Medline、Cochrane图书馆、中国期刊全文数据库、中文科技期刊全文数据库和万方数字化期刊全文数据库,收集格列吡嗪(试验组)对比瑞格列奈(对照组)治疗2型糖尿病疗效和安全性的随机对照试验(RCT),对符合纳入标准的临床研究进行质量评价和资料提取后,采用Rev Man 5.2统计软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入10项RCT,合计1 022例患者。Meta分析结果显示,试验组患者糖化血红蛋白水平[MD=0.43,95%CI(0.20,0.65),P<0.001]、餐后2 h血糖水平[MD=0.49,95%CI(0.04,0.94),P=0.03]和低血糖发生率[OR=2.99,95%CI(1.83,4.88),P<0.001]均显著高于对照组,而两组患者空腹血糖水平比较差异无统计学意义[MD=-0.14,95%CI(-0.44,0.16),P=0.35]。结论:瑞格列奈治疗2型糖尿病疗效和安全性优于格列吡嗪。受纳入研究方法学质量和样本量限制,该结论有待更多设计严格、长期随访的大样本RCT加以验证。OBJECTIVE:To systematically review the efficacy and safety of glipiaide versus repaglinide in treatment of type 2diabetes and provide evidence-based reference for the clinical treatment. METHODS:Pub Med,EMBase,Medline,Cochrane Library,CJFD,VIP and Wan Fang database were retrieved to collect the randomized controlled trials(RCT)of the efficacy and safety of glipizide(test group)versus repaglinide(control group)in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. After the quality evaluation and information collection of clinical studies with inclusion criteria,Rev Man 5.2 software was conducted for Meta-analysis. RESULTS:There were totally 10 RCTs,involving 1 022 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that the Hb A1 c levels [MD=0.43,95% CI(0.20,0.65),P〈0.001],2 h postprandial plasma glucose levels [MD=0.49,95% CI(0.04,0.94),P=0.03] and hypoglycemia incidence [OR=2.99,95%CI(1.83,4.88),P〈0.001] in test group were significantly higher than control group. There was no significant difference in the fasting plasma glucose level in 2 groups[MD=-0.14,95%CI(-0.44,0.16),P=0.35]. CONCLUSIONS:Repaglinide has better efficacy and safety than glipizide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Limited by the methodological quality and sample amount of included studies,it remains to be verified by RCT with large sample,strict design and long-term follow-up.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145