波浪能资源评估方法研究  

RESEARCH ON ASSESSMENT METHOD OF WAVE ENERGY RESOURCES

作　　者：范飞[1,2] 朱志夏 梁丙臣[2] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省交通规划设计院有限股份公司水运中心,南京210000 [2]中国海洋大学工程学院海洋工程系,青岛266100

出　　处：《太阳能学报》2015年第6期1358-1362,共5页Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(51179178);博士科学基金(BS2011HZ016)

摘　　要：以山东半岛为依托对深水简化的波浪能评估方法和Kim简化的评估方法进行对比研究。首先,运用波浪模型SWAN对山东半岛16 a的波候进行模拟,并与观测值进行比较,结果拟合良好;其次,运用这两种评估方法对山东半岛波浪资源能进行计算,并与SWAN模型计算的精确解进行比较;最后,选取两个断面和断面上的10个不同水深点进行研究。研究结果表明:两种简化方法计算结果均比精确解大,随着水深的增加,差距逐渐加大,但与精确解的相关性也逐渐变大,整体而言,深水简化方法要优于Kim简化方法。The assessment method of wave energy resources was studied based on the wave climate of Shandong peninsula. Firstly, 16 year wave climate of Shandong peninsula was simulated by SWAN model, and then the buoy data were used to compare with the model, and the result show that the model fits well with the buoy data. The wave energy resources of Shandong peninsula were computed with two methods. Lastly, two sections and ten points were chosen to study the wave energy with those methods. The results show that the wave energy calculated by Kim＇ s simplified method and general simplified method are larger than the exact data which was calculated by SWAN model. As the water depth increases, the deviation and the correlation to exact solution enlarge. In general, the general simplified method is better than Kim＇ s simplified method.

关 键 词：波浪后报 波浪能 评估方法 方法比较 

分 类 号：TK01[动力工程及工程热物理]