论英美刑法共谋罪之可罚性依据——一个社会心理学的视角  

Research on the basis of penalizing criminal conspiracy in the Anglo-American criminal law——A perspective of social psychology

作　　者：张淑芳[1] 林俊辉[2] 

机构地区：[1]福建农林大学文法学院,福建福州350002 [2]福建省公安厅办公室,福建福州350003

出　　处：《福建农林大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第3期94-98,共5页Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：福建农林大学校青年基金项目(2013xjj37)

摘　　要：社会心理学中的认知失调论认为,作出决定的行为会引发认知失调。群体极化理论认为,群体作出的决策会较个体决策更为极端。群体身份认同理论认为,对群体身份的认同会引起内群体偏袒。从社会心理学视角来看,英美刑法将达成不法协议作为共谋罪的处罚对象,有助于打消共谋者参与共谋的念头,避免共谋者产生认知失调;在极为早期的阶段瓦解共谋犯罪群体,避免更为极端决策出现;弱化共谋者的犯罪群体身份认同,实现法益保护的早期化。这一视角对我国刑法学研究共谋罪规则具有借鉴参考价值。According to the theory of cognitive dissonance,making decisions will lead to a kind of cognitive dissonance in which unpleasant feeling would result. Theory of group polarization believes that compared with individual decision,debased on conformity,it would appear more extreme adventure decision or cautious decision in group decisions. Group identity on criminal conspiracy benefits undertaking of target offences and constitutes a barrier to prosecution of criminal conspiracy from government. In order to avoiding cognitive dissonance,group polarization and group identity among conspirators,criminal conspiracy has been penalized in the Anglo-American criminal law,which provides guidance for Chinese criminal law research on rule of criminal conspiracy.

关 键 词：共谋罪 群体极化 认知失调论 群体身份认同 

分 类 号：D914.1[政治法律—刑法学]