检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何建委[1]
出 处:《南京师范大学文学院学报》2015年第2期184-188,共5页Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University
摘 要:王元化于1948年发表的《论香粉铺之类》一文中,涉及对《围城》之批评。这既被《围城》作者钱钟书反驳,又在学界存在争议。对此,本文立足于1947年初版的《围城》和1948年发表的《论香粉铺之类》,考镜源流,拂去历史的尘埃,客观地呈现这段艺术对话与交锋,审视"痛诋"的合理与盲点,探讨理性批评的边界,予这段公案以客观评价。In 1948,just two years after the publication of Qian Zhongshu ’s Fortress Besieged,Wang Yuanhua offered his severe criticism on this novel,while Qian’s response to Wang criticism was released until almost a half century later in the year of 2006. There have been lots of dispute on this case in academic circle.This paper offers a close reading of the earliest 1947 edition of Fortress Besieged,and Wang’s criticizing article "On the Powder Shop like",analyzes the reason and limitation in Wang’s criticism,in order to give an objective demonstration and fair judgment of this case of literary criticism and dialogue. It will help us to explore the boundary of rational literary criticism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4