检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《天津法学》2015年第2期65-69,共5页Tianjin Legal Science
摘 要:随着司法改革的不断深入,检察机关职能的方式不断发生变化。2013年实施的《刑事诉讼法》赋予检察机关一项新职能:司法救济职能,这与我国国家权力架构和司法体制、诉讼构造及现实条件等因素密不可分。当下,制度本身的缺陷、检察机关权力结构和追诉职能偏向可能限制该职能功能的有效发挥。未来应从司法救济范围、程序性后果、救济程序、再救济等方面对其进行完善;同时,应逐步调整检察机关权力结构,改变偏向追诉的业绩考评机制,促使该模式功能的有效发挥。With the deepening of the judicial reform, changes have taken place in the functions of procuratorial organs. In the Criminal Procedure Law implemented in 2013, the function of judicial relief has been added for the procuratorial organs, which is inseparable with China's national power structure and the judicial system, litigation structure and realistic conditions. At present, the defects of the system itself, the power structure of procuratorial organs and functional deviation of prosecution may limit the efficiency of the function of judicial relief. In the future we should improve it from the scope of judicial relief, procedural consequences, relief procedure and relief; at the same time, we should adjust the structure of procuratorial power, gradually change the prosecution of performance evaluation mechanism, and promote the efficiency of the pattern.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7