20世纪初的“新史学”思潮及其意义——兼论梁启超《新史学》的局限性  

The Ideological Trend and Significance of‘New History'at the Beginning of Twentieth Century——Discussion on Understanding of the Limitations of Liang Qichao's‘New History'

作　　者：杨艳秋[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院历史研究所,北京100732

出　　处：《齐鲁学刊》2015年第3期32-39,共8页Qilu Journal

摘　　要：20世纪初,梁启超发表《新史学》等著述,高呼"史界革命",随即兴起"新史学"思潮,推动中国史学向近代化转型,具有积极的历史意义。"新史学"思潮形成于中华民族危机日益深重的背景下,以历史进化论为思想基础,以批判传统史学而破旧立新,不可避免地带有理念上的局限性,对传统旧史学的批判也有偏激的一面,但不应据此加以全盘否定,更不能因此一味攻击《新史学》的理论基础——历史进化论,从而否定近代新史学取得的超越古代的进步成就。评析梁启超及其《新史学》,是关系到如何看待中国近代史、如何看待中国近代史学的大问题,应当引起学界关注。At the beginning of twentieth Century,Liang Qichao published his ‘New History’,advocated ‘revolution of his-torical circles’.The Ideological Trend of ‘New History’arise,promoted the modern transformation of Chinese history,which had positive historical significance.The Ideological Trend of ‘New History’was formed on the background of Chinese Nation deep crisis,which based on the historical evolutionism,criticized the classical history and destroyed the old and established the new.Though it had investable the idea limitations and extreme side of criticizing on classical history,gave it total negation and blindly assaulted the historical evolutionism of the New History’s theory foundation.which negated the progress achievement of new history surpassing the ancient history.It is important to appraise Liang Qichao and his ‘New History’,which regarded the significant problems of treating China modern history and historiography,it should be concerned by the education circles.

关 键 词：“史界革命” 梁启超 “新史学” 进化论 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]