检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王志超[1]
机构地区:[1]山西师范大学历史与旅游文化学院,山西临汾041004
出 处:《山西农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第7期734-738,744,共6页Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University:Social Science Edition
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目(14&CSS001)
摘 要:"蛊惑家"是雅典民主政治受到后世批评的主要原因之一。"蛊惑家"是由雅典部分精英知识分子与部分历史家共同构建出来的一种历史形象。它虽然并不符合雅典民主政治的发展事实,但还是有一定的社会根源和历史合理性。雅典的政治模式决定了其政治领导权的外在表现和实质内容,加强了雅典人民领袖的"蛊惑家"色彩。"蛊惑家"是雅典政治精英在直接民主制度下既得到权力又受到遏制的典型形象。我们应该客观地、历史地看待"蛊惑家"及其本质。'Demagogues' is the main reason why Athenian democracy was criticized by the later men. The author thinks that it is a historical image constructed by some of intellectual elites and historians. Although it was not in agreement with the reality of Athenian democracy, there was some social reason and historical rationality. The exterior form and real content of Athenian political leadership was determined by its political institutions that have strengthened the impression of demagogues. "Demagogues' have showed that Athenian political elites had either gained some power or been restricted. We should view the image of demagogues impersonally and historically.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222