检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈慎 江燕华[2] 黄日皎[2] 温小平 丁锐[4]
机构地区:[1]珠海市第二人民医院检验科,广东珠海519000 [2]中山大学附属第五医院,广东珠海519000 [3]珠海市高新区人民医院,广东珠海519000 [4]吉林大学珠海学院门诊部,广东珠海519000
出 处:《临床医学工程》2015年第6期810-811,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
摘 要:目的比较不同等级医院间血常规项目的偏差,为血常规结果的互认提供依据。方法采集新鲜血常规标本(20份)分别在不同等级医院检验科进行检测,对血常规结果 [包括白细胞(WBC)、红细胞(RBC)、血小板(PLT)、血红蛋白(Hb)、红细胞比容(HCT)、平均红细胞体积(MCV)]进行统计学分析。结果血常规项目中HCT、MCV、PLT在不同等级医院间有统计学意义(P<0.05),三级医院间所有项目均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论不同等级医院间血常规检验质量有明显差异,还需提高不同医院间检验结果的可比性和准确性。Objective To compare the deviation of routine blood items in different grades of hospitals, in order to provide basis for the results of recognition. Methods The same clinical routine blood specimens(20 cases) were tested in different grades of hospitals, and the results [including white blood cell(WBC), red blood cell(RBC), platelet(PLT), haemoglobin(Hb), hematocrit(HCT) and mean corpuscular volume(MCV)] were statistically analyzed. Results The HCT, MCV, PLT in routine blood items among different grades hospitals had statistical difference(P〈0.05); but results of tertiary hospitals had no statistically significant difference(P〉0.05). Conclusions The quality of routine blood test in different grades hospitals has obvious difference, the comparability and the accuracy of the test result in different hospitals need to improve.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3