检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢文燕[1] 付秀虹[1] 崔利娜[1] 白爱红[1]
机构地区:[1]漯河市中心医院,462000
出 处:《中国实用医药》2015年第16期46-48,共3页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩的可行性及安全性。方法 25例瘢痕子宫再次妊娠经阴道分娩的孕妇作为观察组,同期入院的30例非瘢痕子宫经阴道分娩的孕妇作为对照组,所有孕妇均为自然临产,比较两组产程时间、产时出血量、新生儿Apgar评分、新生儿体重、会阴侧切率、住院时间。结果两组孕妇产程时间、产时出血量、新生儿Apgar评分及出院时间相似,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组的新生儿体重低于对照组,会阴侧切率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在严密监护,具备随时抢救、手术的条件下,符合阴道试产条件的瘢痕子宫孕妇可行阴道分娩。Objective To investigate feasibility and safety of scarred uterus re-pregnancy by vaginal delivery. Methods There were 25 pregnant women with scarred uterus re-pregnancy by vaginal delivery as observation group, and another 30 pregnant women with non-scarred uterus re-pregnancy by vaginal delivery at the same period as control group. All patients had natural labor, and their labor time, intrapartum bleeding volume, neonatal Apgar score, neonatal weight, episiotomy rate, and hospital stay were compared. Results The differences of labor time, intrapartum bleeding volume, neonatal Apgar score, and hospital stay between the two groups had no statistical significance (P〉0,05). The observation group had lower neonatal weight and higher episiotomy rate than the control group, and their difference bad statistical significance (P〈0.05). Conclusion Vaginal delivery can be taken by scarred uterus patients with eligible indication, with close monitoring and timely rescue and operation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117