检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵桂华[1]
出 处:《理论观察》2015年第6期33-35,共3页Theoretic Observation
摘 要:10年前的2005年我国在新颁布的《公司法》中大胆的吸收了西方公司法中的一项重要制度,即公司法人格否认制度。该制度的产生是为了规避在股东有限责任的背景下股东滥用有限责任从而损害债权人的利益的问题。我国企业在进行了公司制的改革后,也同样存在着股东可能滥用有限责任的问题,因此在公司法中规定法人格否认是必须的。但是,从10来的司法实践来看,公司法人格否认制度还没有能够完全发挥其限制股东滥用有限责任,保护无辜债权人的立法目的。本文针对在司法实践中存在的问题,在理论上提出一些建议,以求进一步完善公司法人格否认制度。10 years ago,in 2005,China promulgated the new company lawin bold absorbed the Western corporation law as an important system of corporate personality denial system,i.e.. The generation of this system is in order to avoid the limited liability of shareholdersunder the background of the shareholders abuse the hmited hability to the detriment of the interests of the creditors of the problem. China's enterprises in the reform of company system, also the existence of abuse of limited liability of shareholders may, therefore, in the company law personality deny is a must. However, from the judicial practice of 10 years,the system of disregard of corporate personality has not been able to fully play its limitedshareholders abuse the limited liability, legislation to protect the innocent creditors. In this paper, aiming at the problems in judicial practice, puts forward some suggestions in theory,in order to further improve the system of disregard of corporate personality.
分 类 号:D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117