检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东大学(威海)法学院,山东威海264209 [2]中国政法大学证据科学研究院,北京100088
出 处:《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第3期41-49,共9页Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
基 金:2011年国家社会科学基金项目"法律冲突的适用方法研究"(11CFX074)
摘 要:立法语言审查程序乃是一项对立法语词、句式、篇章结构等文本表达进行审查的立法程序。管窥韩国"语言审查程序"的立法实践可知,该程序在纠正语言错误、提高立法质量、实现法律的规范性和确定性上已经凸显出十分积极的效果。反观我国的立法语言运用现状,立法语言失范现象层出不穷且日益严重。因此,伴随"科学立法""民主立法"的提出以及《立法法》修改之契机,我国立法机关应当在借鉴韩国"语言审查程序"的基础上,设立立法语言审查主体,明确语言审查的内容,并建构一套完整的立法语言审查程序,以保证立法的质量。Legislative language checking procedure is to check the literal expressions, such as words, sentences andchapter structures in legislation. A look into the legislative experience on language checking procedure in South Koreashows positive effect on correcting language faults, improving the qualities of legislation and realizing thenormalization and accuracy of law. However, in Chinese legislative language utilization, irregularities are increasinglyserious. Therefore, with the opportunities of the proposition of “scientific legislation”, “democratic legislation” and themodification of Legislative Law, our state legislature should take measures as follows on drawing the experience fromSouth Korea: set a legislative language checking subject, clarify the contents of language checking, and construct a setof integrated legislative language checking procedure. These measures can ensure the quality and normality oflegislation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222