检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周茂雄
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学法学院
出 处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2015年第2期85-92,共8页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
摘 要:日本近年来积极开展司法改革,特别强调人民参与司法,于2004年引进裁判员制度,实施多年已初见成效。它彻底改变了日本60多年来法官一统天下的格局,打破了法官与人民之间的隔阂、加深了人民对司法的了解信赖,同时又提高了司法审判效率。有鉴于日本受中华文化影响,民情文化多相似,因此,日本的裁判员制度对于我国人民陪审员制度的完善具有一定的参考价值及借鉴意义。我国应将人民陪审员制度宪法化,借鉴和反思日本的经验,制定《人民陪审员法》,以促进人民陪审员制度不断完善。In recent years, Japan actively promotes judicial reform, particularly emphasizing on people's participation in the judicial. In 2004, Japan set up the referee system, which has been implemented for many years and achieved initial success. It completely changed the pattern existing for sixty years that judges dominates justice, broke the barriers between the judges and the public, deepened people's understanding and trust in the administration of justice and increased the efficiency of judicial trial. Influenced by the same Chinese culture and having similar community culture, the Japanese referee system is of great help in improving our people's jury system. In order to make people's jury system into full play in China, it is necessary for us to learn from Japanese experience and include our People's Jury Svstem into constitution
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147