论亨利现象学与“神学的转向”的问题  

Henry's Phenomenology and "Theological Turn"

作　　者：江海全 

机构地区：[1]师范大学政法学院,海南海口571158

出　　处：《社会科学》2015年第7期128-137,共10页Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金“现象学中的逆意向性理论研究”(项目编号:10BZX050)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：法国学者D.雅尼考(Dominique Janicaud)对亨利现象学神学转向的指责是没有根据的,是对亨利现象学基本精神的误解。现象学的彻底化和走向神学在胡塞尔那里,早已埋下了伏笔,上帝问题在现象学中是一个合法的问题;亨利进一步深化了现象学与神学的交融,二者体现出高度的一致性和互惠关系;亨利将现象学推进到了神学领域,是通过现象学研究主题的转向以及现象学意向性的逆转推进了现象学的彻底化发展。French scholar Dominique Janicaud criticizes Henry that there is a ＂theological turn＂ in his phenomenology. This argument is untenable, and a misunderstanding of the basic spirit of Henry＇s phenomenology. Husserl has foreshadowed the radicalization of phenomenology and its moving toward theology, and God is a legitimate problem in Husserl＇s phenomenology. Henry further deepens the blend of phenomenology with theology, these two disciplines present the high degree of consistency and mutually beneficial relationship. Henry＇s developing phenomenology into theology fields is not a ＂theological turn＂, instead he promotes the radicalization of phenomenology by a phenomenological research topic turn and a reversal of phenomenological intentionality.

关 键 词：现象学 神学转向 彻底化 现象性 生命 基督教 

分 类 号：B565[哲学宗教—外国哲学]