检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:馮曉青 Fu Yao Zhang Yang
机构地区:[1]中國政法大學 [2]最高人民法院知識產權司法保護研究中心
出 处:《中国法律(中英文版)》2015年第2期39-44,共6页China Law
摘 要:引言 成立知识产权法院,推进中国知识产权司法改革,统一知识产权司法裁判标准,加强知识产权司法保护,是2014年以来中国知识产权司法保护中一个具有里程碑意义的大事。2013年11月十八届三中全会审议通过的《中共中央关於全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》就提出要‘加强知识产权的运用和保护,健全技术创新激励机制,探索建立知识产权法院’。Introduction The establishment of IPR courts for pressing ahead with the judicial reform of Chinese IPR Laws, the unification of judicial adjudication standards of the IPR cases and better judicial protection of the IPR has been a significant milestone for judicial protection of Chinese intellectual property since 2014. Decision of the CCCPC on Some Major Issues Concerning Comprehensively Deepening the Reform adopted at the Third Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on November 12, 2013 put forward that we will strengthen the application and protection of intellectual property rights (IPR), and improve the technological innovation incentive mechanism, and explore ways to set up IPR courts. Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on the Establishment of Courts of Intellectual Property in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou adopted at the Tenth Session of the Standing Committee of the 12th NPC put forward that the purpose of setting up IPR courts is to promote the national strategy of innovation-driven development,
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.149.213