检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖颖[1]
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2015年第15期102-103,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的为慢性阻塞性肺部疾病(COPD)病人探讨一种疗效确切,易接受的吸氧方法。方法采用分层随机化的方法将随机选用的90例COPD患者分成A、B、C三组,A组采用单侧鼻塞吸氧,B组采用单侧鼻导管吸氧,C组采用双孔吸氧管吸氧,均与吸氧前,吸氧后2 h,吸氧后6 h分别作动脉血气分析,结合问卷调查,从而详细了解患者的耐受性。结果三种吸氧方法之间的氧疗效果差异无显著意义(P>0.05),且双孔吸氧管吸氧的方法对鼻咽部无剌激,病人更愿意接受。结论双孔吸氧管吸氧在COPD患者的治疗中应进一步推广应用。Objective To investigate the efficacy of a clear acceptable oxygen method for chronic pulmonary disease. Methods According to the stratified randomization divided the 90 patients into A, B, C three groups, group A with unilateral nasal oxygen, group B with unilateral oxygen through nasal catheter, group C with double orifice oxygen, after oxygen, oxygen 2 hours and 6 hours, Do check arterial blood gas analysis, combined with the questionnaire survey, to learn more about the patients tolerance. Results There were no significant differences of oxygen effects among oxygen methods. This method does not stimulate note pharynx ministry and the patient was willing to accept. Conclusion Application of double orifice oxygen In the COPD patients should be further promoted.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74