萧统责《闲情赋》而《文选》录《神女》诸赋之因探——兼论两者之异非因各自成于不同的时间  

An Analysis of the Reason for Blaming Ode to Leisure by Xiao Tong and for Goddess Collected in Wenxuan:On the Reason for Differences Between the Two not Because of Works Written in Different Times

作　　者：力之[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学文学院,广西桂林541004

出　　处：《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第1期100-106,共7页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金西部项目"<文选>成书考说"(10XZW010)

摘　　要：昭明太子于陶渊明作品强调其致"讽谏"之效,而《文选》录文的"底线"是无"有伤风教"。学者或未明这一点而认为两者之异是"自相矛盾",失之远矣。萧统编纂《文选》时之目的为"娱玩文华",而后来撰《陶渊明集序》时因忧失"太子之位"才"突然强调起风教"说,未达一间。即出现"这么大的反差",是太子采用不同之价值取向所致,而非因作于"不同时间"。就目前所能了解的相关文献言,《陶渊明集序》之作时,似仍当以大通丁未年为近是。Prince Zhaoming pointed out the effect of ＂remonstrance＂ made in Tao Yuan-ming＇s works, and the basic requirement of collected works in Wenxuan is not against the ritual style. Scholars who haven＇t understood the point think the differences between the two are self-contradictory, which goes too far from the point. Xiao Tong compiled the Wenxuan out of ＂love for essence of literature＂; but when writing Pref- ace for Tao Yuan-ming Collection, he began to stress the ritual style for being afraid of losing his title of prince, which differed only slightly. The cause for such a big contrast is different value orientation of the Prince, not different writing times of works. According to the related papers available at present, it seemed that the time to write Preface for Tao Yuan-ming Collection was close to the Da Tong Ding Wei Year.

关 键 词：《文选》 《闲情赋》 《陶渊明集序》 价值取向 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]