检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京协和医学院护理学院,北京市100144 [2]北京地坛医院红丝带之家
出 处:《中华护理杂志》2015年第7期882-885,共4页Chinese Journal of Nursing
基 金:协和青年科研基金学生创新项目(3332013013)
摘 要:目的引进Berger艾滋病(HIV)感知歧视量表并对中文版量表进行信效度检验。方法遵循量表翻译原则.对量表进行翻译、回译和文化调适,便利抽取208例艾滋病患者进行调查,使用SPSS18.0进行统计学分析,计算中文版量表的信效度。结果中文版BergerHIV感知歧视量表总的内部一致性系数为0.945,4个维度的内部一致性系数分别是:0.934、0.780、0.847、0.918,总量表的重测信度为0.819。量表内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.865,各个条目的内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.8~1.0,量表得分与流调中心抑郁量表得分呈显著正相关(r=0.329,P〈0.01)。结论中文版BergerHIV感知歧视量表具有良好的信度和效度,可用于评价我国HIV/AIDS患者的感知歧视。Objective To translate the Berger HIV stigma seale(BHSS) into Chinese and test its reliability and validity. Methods The Chinese version of Berger HIV stigma seale(C-BHSS) was developed through the process of translation,back-translation and cross-cultural adaptation. A convenient sample of 208 HIV/AIDS patients was inves- tigated using C-BHSS to test the reliability and validity. Results The internal consistency coefficient of the C- BHSS and four subseales was 0.945,0.934,0.780,0.847 and 0.918,respectively. The test-retest reliability of C-BHSS was 0.819. The scale content validity index(S-CVI) was 0.865,and the item content validity index(I-CVI) ranged from 0.8 to 1.0 The total score of C-BHSS was positively correlated with the total score of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)(r=0.329,P〈0.01). Conclusion The C-BHSS has been proved to be reliable and valid. It can be used as a valid tool for the measurement of perceived stigma among people living with HIV in China.
关 键 词:获得性免疫缺陷综合征 偏见 信度 效度
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15