竞赛过失伤害行为的类型重构与刑事责任法理探究  

Athletic Competition Fault Damage Behavior Type Refactoring and Criminal Responsibility

作　　者：王桢[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《天津体育学院学报》2015年第1期77-81,共5页Journal of Tianjin University of Sport

基　　金：西南政法大学研究生科研创新计划资助项目(项目编号:XZYJS2014086)

摘　　要：我国对竞赛过失伤害行为的刑事责任研究仍显薄弱,原因是现有的分类方式不能为刑事责任的法理研究提供理想的分类模型,以此找出罪与非罪的理由进行详细探讨。因此,需要在确立其行为的构成要件后对其内容展开讨论,根据竞赛违规目的与过失伤害行为、竞赛违规心理与犯罪过失心理2对关系进行类型的重构,将其分为纯粹的竞赛过失伤害行为与故意的竞赛过失伤害行为。纯粹的竞赛过失伤害行为虽然具有违法性,但满足刑法在体育行业发展过程中的谦抑需要,且兼具责任能力减弱的条件,因而不具有刑事可罚性。故意的竞赛过失伤害行为因违反保护其他运动员的义务,具有适法的期待可能性,违反竞技体育精神,应当承担刑事责任。但是在量刑上,应优先考虑财产刑、有条件的缓刑等轻缓的手段。China＇s criminal liability for the race negligence injury inquiry remains weak, the reason is that the existing classification methods can/t provide an ideal classification model for criminal responsibility according to law research, and to find out and discuss the reasons of sin and the sin. Negligence inju- ry, therefore, need to be in competition behavior based on the constitutive requirements, according to their subjective aspect and objective aspect of the rela- tionship between types of refactoring, it can be divided into pure race fault damage behavior and intentional damage fault behavior. Pure competition fault dam- age behavior because of its accord with the requirement of industry development, meet the theory of responsibility ability to weaken, the principle of criminal law of fit tolerance is not a crime. Competition fault damage behavior for violating an obligation to protect other players, has the suitable method of expected possibility, in violation of the competitive sports spirit, should be condemned. But on the sentencing, priority should be given property punishment, probation and the mitigation of conditional means.

关 键 词：竞赛过失伤害行为 类型重构 纯粹的竞赛过失伤害行为 故意的竞赛过失伤害行为 刑事责任 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]