欧盟法视野下过境货物的海关执法措施:程序法向实体法的演变  

Customs Enforcement of IP Law against Goods In-Transit in View of EU Law:From Procedural Law to Substantial Law

作　　者：杨帆[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学国际法研究所,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《南京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第2期51-56,共6页Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics（Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目(13AFX028)

摘　　要：欧盟法院在Polo Lauren案中的判决确认了以3295/94号条例为法律基础的"生产假设理论",使得成员国可以根据本国国内法对过境货物进行扣押。这引起了自由贸易主义者的反对,随后发生的印度仿药过境运输案引起了欧盟对过境货物执法措施的反思,欧盟法院在著名的Nokia/Philips案中做出的初步裁决以及旨在撤销备受争议的1383/2003号条例的608/2013号条例的出台,很大程度上减轻了外界对欧盟海关措施的质疑,随着欧盟开始着手修改商标条例,标志着欧盟对过境货物的规制转移到实体法层面上来。The decision of ECJ in Polo Lauren case confirmed the regulation 3295/94 as the legal basis of manufacturing fiction theory, which enables its member to detain goods in-transit on the basis of its do- mestic law. This decision arouses opposition from trade liberalists. The following Indian-EU generic drug case leads to a reflection of border measures by EU, the ECJ＇s preliminary decision in the famous NO- KIA/ Philips case and the enforcement of regulation 608/2013 removed doubts on EU customs measures; however, with EU^s action to amend its trademark regulation, EU has diverted its attention of regulating goods in-transit to substantial law level.

关 键 词：生产假设 边境措施 欧盟法 过境货物 知识产权 

分 类 号：D997[政治法律—国际法学]